A primer on the nature and procedure of science. Nor has any credible proof ever surfaced that they poison the body and lead to cancer, or that pancreatic enzyme deficiency is associated to cancer, or that enzymes supplied from animal or vegetable sources can replace human enzymes, or that pancreatic enzymes seek out and kill cancer cells.
By contrast, government spending on more applied research” at universities was significantly less generous, increasing to just below $10 billion The energy of the lie was palpable: the cost-free play of free of charge intellects” would supply the understanding that the nation needed to confront the challenges of the future.
Situations in which scientists detect and address flaws in operate constitute evidence of success, not failure,” a group of leaders of the American science establishment — including the previous, present, and future presidents of the National Academy of Sciences — wrote in Science in 2015, simply because they demonstrate the underlying protective mechanisms of science at operate.” But this happy posture ignores the systemic failings at the heart of science’s troubles these days.
One of the common themes was “who evaluates the artifacts?” Initially, most artifacts are deemed only for publications otherwise currently accepted, and in most instances the evaluation is accomplished non-anonymously by a distinct set of reviewers.
Sinon, j’ai quand même un doute sur l’intitulé du point 5: Je me souviens d’avoir lu avec beaucoup d’intérêt un specific nombre de choses sur, au contraire, la mathématisation des sciences, “Pourquoi le réel est-il mathématisable?”, dans un numéro spécial de “La Recherche” je crois, et même un bouquin d’un particular Georges Lochak qui s’appelait, toujours de mémoire, “la géométrisation de la physique”, qui m’avait beaucoup impressionné et que je dois encore avoir quelque component dans le placard qui me sert de bibliothèque.…